The Tottenham Magistrates sign Haringey Council’s print outs of many names and “hey presto” 1000s of council tax liability orders and £115 costs are dumped blind, in bulk on the late paying residents including;
· The elderly; • residents with a disability;
· the seriously ill; • the recently bereaved;
· single parent families; • pregnant women;
· unemployed residents,
• those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.”
Magistrates are blind to any of the vulnerable circumstances of Haringey residents when they make these decisions in bulk.
I am particularly indignant about the cumulative impacts of cuts, caps and council tax on the mental and physical health of the poorest Haringey residents which have never been assessed by national and local government. (3) (4)
At the request of Haringey Council the Tottenham Magistrates decided a total of over 21,877 liability orders in bulk in 2013/14 at an average of 810 a time at 27 hearings. The largest bulk imposition was 2,168 and the smallest 29. The magistrates now impose £115 costs on top of council tax, rent, utility and other unmanageable debts due to shredded benefits, which have been taxed by the council since April 2013.
On the 19th September 2014 I asked Grant Thornton, Haringey’s auditors, to audit the £125 costs awarded to Haringey Council by Tottenham Magistrates on the 2nd August 2013 and to take into account the well being and vulnerable circumstances of 1000s of Haringey residents. (£125 costs were charged by Haringey from April 2010 to August 2015). They replied on the 5th May 2015;
I wrote to Grant Thornton on the 3rd May 2015:
"You might also consider asking the local GPs and NHS by how much their costs have increased due to the increasing impact of debt on the health of residents since their benefits were taxed in April 2013. See Royal College of Psychiatrists and The Faculty of Public Health. (5) (6)The council now has responsibility for public health and that means prevention of the costs to the taxpayer of ill health that accrue from the tax and its draconian enforcement."
They replied on the 5th May;
“We have no remit … to opine on the impact of this policy on the well-being of those required to pay council tax”
On the 15th June 2016 I will be claiming that the new level of £115 costs are unlawful because the relevant evidence of the vulnerable circumstances of 1000s of Haringey residents was not taken into account when the level of £115 was decided by Haringey Council. The council was advised by Grant Thornton to “maximise” the costs “as high as possible” and to be loosely “broadly reasonable” and “not unreasonable” when the regulations are very tight. £115 was agreed by the Magistrates on the 12th August 2015.
The liability order enables draconian enforcement of council tax by the council.
“If a liability order is granted the council will be able to take one or more of the following actions: Instruct bailiffs to take your goods to settle your debt - this can include your car. You will be liable to pay the bailiffs costs which could substantially increase the debt. Instruct your employer to deduct payments from your salary or wages. Deduct money straight from your jobseekers allowance or income support. Make you bankrupt. Make a charging order against your home. Have you committed to prison”.
Haringey should have informed Grant Thornton about the;
DCLG “Guidance to local councils on good practice in the collection of Council Tax arrears” ,which supports vulnerable people seven times and, “ should be seen alongside a range of existing good practice, including that set out in the original council tax codes of practice and the National Standards for Enforcement Agents” produced by the MOJ "In particular this (DCLG) guidance deals with the kinds of help and support that Local Authorities should be giving to vulnerable people, both in the run up to enforcement activity taking place and afterwards.(10)
· the elderly; • residents with a disability; •
· the seriously ill; • the recently bereaved; •
· single parent families; • pregnant women;
· unemployed residents ; and, • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.”
HARINGEY COUNCIL'S MEANINGLESS OATH.
Haringey Council made a meaningless oath/affirmation to Tottenham Magistrates on the 12th August 2015 when proposing a reduction of enforcement costs from £125 for a summons and a liability order to £102 for a summons plus £13 for the liability order.
“I confirm that the documents available to the District Judge at the hearing at Tottenham Magistrates Court on the 12-08-2015 included the schedule of costs attached with this letter.”
It is reasonable to expect the Magistrates to check that vulnerable situations, as recommended by the DCLG and the MOJ, have been taken into account and to insist that Haringey Council confirm on oath/affirmation that the council’s calculations supporting the council tax costs of £102 for a summons plus £13 for a liability order fully comply with the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992.
PN 12/6/16
