KUWG on Twitter

Showing posts with label inequality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inequality. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 September 2017

Saturday 23 September: March in North London vs social cleansing and global corporate privatisation of council land

Gordon Peters of Haringey Unite Community writes:

.... Haringey Council in north London is planning to go ahead with a £2 billion redevelopment of its public housing stock, gentrifying neighbourhoods and pricing local people out of living in the area. But a grassroots campaign against Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV) has been building.....
Partly because we found out from a Freedom of Information request, that there has been a secret ‘shadow’ inner cabinet process of meetings with Lendlease, the preferred developer, from before the point of them being agreed as preferred bidder for the contract on HDV. This included the member recently appointed to be on the putative HDV Board, Cllr. Elin Weston who is now the lead member for children and families.
I crowd funded £25,000 to pay for legal fees for a Judicial Hearing which will be held in the High Court - Royal Courts of Justice on The Strand - on 25 and 26 October, where there will be a presence outside from 9:30 on 25th.
This could lead to a landmark decision on how Councils, through their Cabinets, make decisions on property deals with big developers altering the whole nature of communities, at the expense of the less well-off and poor, as has been happening across London and mainly by Labour councils. Issues in front of the court include lack of basic democracy, consultation, equalities impact, commercial secrecy and fair process.
There is a march and demonstration in Haringey this Saturday, 23 September, against HDV. Folks from elsewhere in London will be attending too (e.g. Cressingham Gardens, Lambeth in south London, who are campaigning against a similar development in their borough and who have also been in Judicial Review).
The march starts at Tottenham Green, at 12 noon and onto Ducketts Common (site of the massive defeat of the NF by the community in the late 70s) down Green Lanes - one of the last roads that hasn’t been totally taken over by corporate franchises - and finishes at 2pm at the Manor House tube end of Finsbury Park. Sian Berry, Green Party London Assembly Member, has agreed to speak at demo/end of the march.
There is also a benefit gig with Potent Whisper and others at The Beehive pub in Tottenham from 7pm on Saturday evening. The film Dispossession, The Great Social Housing Swindle is being shown at the Haringey Independent Cinema in West Green this Thursday evening (21 September)

Immediately at risk are 1300 homes on Northumberland Park estate, Tottenham, behind them are hundreds and hundreds more on multiple estates, this is people's homes, this is the reality of London in 2017.
A good presence on the demonstration this coming Saturday will be really important to keep up the momentum that is building, especially given what is now happening in the local Labour Party. Support this campaign against this cruel social cleansing operation which is threatening to spread to many other parts of London.

 More at https://londongreenleft.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/grassroots-coalition-grows-against.html

Sunday, 7 May 2017

Abusive bullies avoid embarrassing questions

The scale of right wing 'welfare reformist' government abuses is now more mainstream than it was when David Cameron gave a speech in 2007 stating that tougher benefit sanctions were required.(1) The tactics and strategies of the abusive bullies are still very much the same, however.


Tory chief whip Gavin Williamson asks, “Is Jeremy Corbyn going to be the one who is going to stand up and get the best for Britain [in Brexit negotiations] or is Theresa May?” (Tories determined to follow 'get Corbyn' strategy, CNJ, May 4, 2017.(2))

Perhaps a lot depends on what he means by 'Britain'. Among the billionaires domiciled in the UK according to the Sunday Times Rich List 2017. there is "a record number of British billionaires - 134 - with 14 new ones emerging over the last year."(3) 
Yet Britain is very unequal socio-economically. In 2015, according to NHS figures, 7300 people were admitted to hospital with malnutrition — an increase of 50% since 2010. Homelessness is up 54% since 2010.(4)

Moreover, in negotiations bullies think that the bullying tactics used at home against those with no real bargaining power is 'strong leadership'. Among the tactics successive UK governments have used to deflect and pre-empt criticism of deteriorating services for benefit claimants have been the besmirching of the reputation and hence public goodwill toward those who have been abused by woefully inadequate and exploitative 'benefits helplines' as remote control has replaced face-to-face contact with decision-makers. In the mid-noughties while 21m calls to Jobcentre Plus helplines in 2004/5 went unanswered,(5) a Blairite government was running its Tory-lite 'Targeting BenefitThieves' campaign.(6)

Now, furthering the isolation and invisibility of benefit claimants while'benefits helpline' calls cost pay-as-you-go mobile phone users £33/hr, the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) has decided to close a number of jobcentres used by Camden New Journal readers, including Kilburn andHighgate (near Archway) to 'improve the service' without consulting service users.(7)

The EU's Chief Negotiator has more bargaining power than a DWP 'customer'.(8)

Now at this General Election time, the Tory chief whip's tactic of changing the agenda when faced with embarrassing questions gives rise to new meaning for a cartoon by Crippen the Disabled Cartoonist's 'Welfare Warfare' series.(9) The cartoon depicts a group of disabled people at a meeting presided over by the then Tory Prime Minister and Disability Minister who state: 
“Don't worry — when we want your opinion, we'll tell you what it is.”

Link references

  1. http://kilburnunemployed.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/benefit-claimants-require-firmer-safegards-not-tougher-sanctions.html
  2. http://camdennewjournal.com/article/corbyn-wont-save-people-from-food-banks-warns-tory-chief-whip-gavin-williamson
  3. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39830087 title: "UK's super-rich carry on making billions" 
  4. http://taxpayersagainstpoverty.org.uk/news/civil-disobedience-fully-justified
  5. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2006/11/16/jobcentre-plus-poor-service-continues/
  6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw0zno5G3hw
  7. http://kilburnunemployed.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/terra-firma-benefits-services-closures-leave-the-economically-vulnerable-in-the-lurch.html
  8. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-brexit-negotiating-draft-european-council-president-donald-tusk-union-latest-a7659316.html
  9. http://www.crippencartoons.co.uk/wp-content/archive/cartoons/welfarewarfare/welfarewarfare12.shtml

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

The new Prime Minister as ultimate mandator of safeguarding for vulnerable people

This blog has just published a guest blog post by Revd Paul Nicolson of Taxpayers Against Poverty: 'The Monstrous Unfairness of Benefit Sanctions'.(1)

The guest blog post cites a Guardian article 'If Theresa May [the new Prime Minister] is serious about tackling inequality she'll ditch Osborneomics'.(2) Of course, a keyword or keyword combination in the guest blog post is 'benefit sanctions'; a search for 'benefit sanctions' on that Guardian article revealed zero mention of 'benefit sanctions'. The sub-title of the guest blog post is 'PM must look below the statistics to tackle the inequalities of income, wealth, health & administration of justice', and of course the issuing of benefit sanctions' involves the application of someone's idea of punishment, a word associated with the administration of justice. Prof. David Webster of U. Glasgow has written that the application of benefit sanctions and lack of scrutiny regarding the application of benefit sanctions gives rise to statistics that are an indictment on our society.(3)

The gathering of statistics presupposes an awareness of what the researcher and policy makers are looking for. A search for the term 'benefit sanctions' in the new PM's speech draws a blank.(4) Theresa May's predecessor as Prime Minister who heralded a surge of benefit sanctions in a speech to Conservative & Unionist Party Autumn Conference 2007 in a speech calling for tougher benefit sanctions, when a lack of official safeguarding for vulnerable jobcentre clients was a major issue.(5) Further, regardless of who the new Conservative & Unionist Party Prime Minister is, elected in the absence of a General Election, an extension of the sanctioning regime is built into Universal Credit, while the emphasis goes from low pay to low income.(6) That extension of sanctions owes much to the abstentions of 184 Labour MPs before Jeremy Corbyn was elected its leader.

The forgetfulness and other health and competence issues that frequently accompany vulnerability make it more likely that poor people will not be able to fulfil their Claimant Conditionality; thus they are more likely to be sanctioned on Jsa, ESA WRAG [Work Related Activity Group] or Universal Credit.(7) and (8)

Now, it is even more likely that even more vulnerable people will be benefit sanctioned, as there will be fewer specialist Disability Employment Advisers to intervene when the inevitable happens.(9)

So, new UK Prime Minister Theresa May, have you mandated your newly appointed Secretary of State for Work & Pensions to address that matter?

Link addresses


  1. http://kilburnunemployed.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/the-monstrous-unfairness-of-benefit-sanctions.html
  2. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/19/theresa-may-industrial-inequality-osbornomics-austerity
  3. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/benefit-sanctions-britains-secret-penal-system
  4. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2016/jul/13/theresa-mays-speech-what-she-said-and-what-she-meant
  5. http://kilburnunemployed.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/benefit-claimants-require-firmer-safegards-not-tougher-sanctions.html
  6. https://scottishunemployedworkers.net/2016/07/15/sharing-knowledge-in-the-face-of-further-attacks/
  7. http://www.katebelgrave.com/2014/10/you-must-do-your-jsa-jobsearch-online-even-though-we-know-you-cant/
  8. http://www.katebelgrave.com/2016/03/closed-claims-lost-housing-benefit-how-ids-contempt-for-sick-or-disabled-claimants-played/
  9. http://www.katebelgrave.com/2016/07/video-jobcentre-adviser-says-disability-support-is-wrecked-fix-this-mr-green/






Sunday, 19 June 2016

Unite Community-sponsored 'Inequality Bus Tour' 2014 video

KUWG members were there. Sadly, it seems, authors of the Housing & Planning Bill 2016 could not really care about inequality.

Get on board the video record of the event.(1)

Link
https://vimeo.com/93208717


Unite Community-sponsored 'Inequality Bus Tour' (2014) and tenancy rights-related post

This blog post in its original form has attracted over 1,000 viewings since April 2014 — making it this blog's 'All Time Greatest Hits' (since May 2012) #2. As most viewings of this blog have been sourced via Google searches, maybe it deserves an encore with a bit of present looking back rewording? This blog administrator may not have been well enough to attend the 'Kill the Housing Bill' himself yesterday, but he can still make his presence known as an opponent of the Housing & Planning Bill 2016. Or is that an Act of Parliament yet?

Whichever, if it is an Act it certainly needs repealing!


KUWGAs leafleted Kilburn Jobcentre to publicise Unite Community-sponsored 'Inequality Bus Tour'

Inequality Bus Tour went through Kilburn on Saturday 26 April 2014. Get on board!

KUWG placard: Zero Compassion Contracts? No Thanks
Some baldies are more discreet than others


Out and proud! Sunbathing, Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group Activist style


What are you laughing at?


What were we advertising? See below
The leaflet from Unite the Union Community Section reads:


A HOME IS YOUR RIGHT

The Housing Inequality Bus Tour is coming to you! Saturday 26th April 2014

OUR CITY IS FOR LIVING IN

We are bringing
  • Music
  • Refreshments
  • Useful information that can help with your housing problems
Hop on the bus to find out more about what is causing London's housing crisis and what we are doing about it.


OUR ROUTE:

  • 32 Cambridge Avenue NW6, 1pm Approx.
  •  Bishops Avenue N2, 1:30pm Approx.
  • West Hendon Estate NW9: 2pm Apprx.
  • Jubilee Sports Centre, W10: 2:45pm Approx.
  • South Kilburn Estate — Peel Precinct, NW6. 3:30pm Approx.

Our tour visits places in London that show the harsh human consequences of our housing crisis.

Soaring private sector rents, sale of social homes, evictions due to welfare reform and gentrification, and the use of London's houses as investment properties for excessively walthy people, all meaning that ordinary people are finding it increasingly difficult to live in the city. These are things we don't have to accept. A home is your right, our city is for living in!

Organised by Unite the union Community section and local housing groups

community@unitetheunion.org
Facebook: Unitetheunion1
Twitter: @unitetheunion




Monday, 11 April 2016

David Cameron's father and the Panama tax haven scandal

It strikes me that the news coverage of the fallout from the Panorama Panama tax havens disclosures
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b076vwwy
is descending into, "You show me yours, and I'll show you mine" on tax returns.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36010902

This Government is cutting disability benefits and sanctioning people. Even without that State terrorism,27 per cent of single parents have a disability, compared with 21 per cent of couple parents

Revd Paul Nicolson of Taxpayers Against Poverty has already written regarding lack of adequate nutrition for pregnant parents in Tottenham, etc.

By contrast, whatever the legalities, David Cameron's father had enough to live on to stash money away offshore and was a 'huge inspirational' 'glass half full,' inspirational figure, role model for the current Prime Minister.

Some people have much larger glasses than others, and yet still insist on depriving others of already inadequate incomes. Evidence-gathering for 'welfare to work' 'welfare reform', meanwhile, is policy-driven.

Friday, 24 April 2015

Steps toward affordable homes

By Dude Swheatie of Kwug
Dame Tessa [Jowell] said: “If you have a six-month lease in very poor accommodation, it doesn’t feel like home. It just feels like somewhere you can afford to live for a period of time.”
....
The former Olympics minister added that there was “a growing sense that London was a city for the very poor and the ultra rich” and that she was tired of investors buying up homes like “gold bars”.
The idea of rent caps has been floated within Camden’s Labour Party for several months. Last year, council leader Sarah Hayward wrote a newspaper article on the difficulty facing those searching for an affordable home.

It might just as easily be said that the UK is a nation populated by the very rich and very poor and that human traffickers overseas are like dope peddlers when they sell dreams of peace and prosperity to those desperate to flee war situations.

But what would be your 'steps toward making homes more affordable'?

Leave comments on a blogspot blog post

https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/42399?hl=en


Monday, 13 April 2015

Social security and immunisation

A question for candidates in the 2015 UK General Election, by Dude Swheatie of Kwug

The Australian Prime Minister has declared that families refusing to vaccinate their children should have their childcare benefits stopped in a 'no jab, no pay' policy.(1) Given that vaccination actually lowers people's immunity to a gamut of diseases and that this combination of a chemical cosh with a fiscal cosh puts society more into the clutches of Big Pharma, would it not be better for national health to ensure that benefit levels are sufficient to resource people's diets sufficiently to strengthen their immune systems against a broad variety of diseases than to add to the risk of poverty?

Notes
(1) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-32273992 accessed 13 April 2015

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Inequality, Health Insurance and ILF (Independent Living Fund)

By Dude Swheatie of Kwug

Tottenham Hotspur Football Club — aka 'Spurs' — has gained some infamy in recent years for links between its stadium expansion plans and the gentrification of Tottenham, as well as providing case study exemplification in how a multi-million pound corporation can screw money out of Council Tax payers. (Council homes in Love Lane were demolished so that Spurs' corporate customers would not have to walk through a council estate!) Yet a story broadcast on the London regional news output of BBC TV and ITV on Monday 16 February gives another prime example regarding social inequality in modern Britain and much more.

ITV reports Spurs found liable for player's brain damage [sic], while the BBC website reports Tottenham Hotspur liable for player brain damage [sic]. (Very much in line with capitalist thinking, the term 'brain damage' suggests, perhaps, that the brain is a piece of merchandise. I would much prefer use of the term 'brain injury', and people with brain injury are all too frequently labelled 'brain damaged' as a derogatory term.) This compensation arises from the apparent negligence of Spurs as an employer to one of their former playing staff members Radwan Hamed who had a heart attack while he was playing in a match for them. (Spurs were held 70% liable and the the Football Association's Regional Cardiologist for South-East England 30% liable.)

Of course, in awarding the compensation which could reach £7m for the injury incurred in a 2006 youth game, loss of potential earnings would be a major factor. Such are footballers' wages and potential wage losses. Sadly however, not all disabled people have such a good starting point in life. The Independent Living Fund has previously provided some finanancial buffering for the most severely disabled people. But the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition has determined to eliminate that while shedding reponsibility for ILF's aftermath onto the councils that the same Government has determined should forever cut expenditure and have fewer resources.

That is the same Government that has maintained that the deaths of disabled people via the Atos inquisition has nothing to do with the actions of this Government. But of course, they have the right wing press and the BBC largely on their side as well as highly paid lawyers paid out of the public purse, and family-based carers are not so fortunate.

This is what comes from successive UK Governments being 'advised' on 'welfare reform' by an American health insurance company called Unum since 1994.

Tuesday, 12 August 2014

Taxpayers Against Poverty — the common good or oppression

From Revd Paul Nicolson of Taxpayers Against Poverty

A TAP letter published in The Observer on Sunday 10 August is about the Byzantine complexity of central government paying benefits and local government taxing them. I suggest it is better to tax the wealthy another £1.2 billion which could pay the council tax of the poorest citizens with some left over for the common good. 

The Observer 10 August 20
14

Taxation: a 50p tax rate would do so much for the common good


The conventional wisdom that says a 50p rate would be mainly symbolic is wrong
There is a question missing from your leader on tax ("On tax, our politicians are just too cowardly", Comment). It should be asked of every member of parliament elected in 1979 and since. How did this nation arrive at a byzantine system of national government paying social security, intended to secure the lawful survival and shelter of the poorest citizens
,
and then allowing local government to tax it? A national administrative army pays a very inadequate £72.40 a week jobseekers' allowance to individual adults; then the local army taxes it an average of £149 a year council tax.
Unsurprisingly, given that £72.40 now has to pay some of the rent and that other laws have reduced its value, while the prices of food and fuel rise, there are late and non-payers of council tax. 
Byzantium expects a third army of magistrates, court and council enforcers to be paid for, even by the poorest citizens, by charging up to £125 on top of the arrears and more for the private army of bailiffs
Sadly, you subscribe to the conventional wisdom that raising income tax to a 50p rate for the highly affluent and an additional £1.2bn a year from a mansion tax is mainly symbolic.
Not so; £1.2bn would pay all the average £149 a year council tax of the 2.3 million working-age families claiming social security, saving them £348m a year, with £852m left over and saving admin and enforcers' costs.
It was estimated in 2009 that a 50p tax rate above £150,000 a year income would raise a further £1.3bn in 2010/11, rising to £3.05bn in 2011/12. Think what that could do for the common good.
The Rev Paul Nicolson
Taxpayers Against Poverty
,


OPPRESSIVE UK GOVERNMENT FORCES UNMANAGEABLE DEBTS ON POOREST CITIZENS - THEN ADDS THE COSTS OF THE BAILIFFS. 
The Tablet 8th August 20

93 Campbell Road, 
Tottenham, 
London N17 0BF
0208 3765455
07961 177889
also at www.z2k.org 

Please sign our petition celbrating Martin Luther King
Parliament is asked to debate the speech made by Martin Luther King 50 Years ago in Washington USA on the 28 August 1963 and to note that it can be applied to circumstances in Britain in August 2013. He said “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.”