KUWG on Twitter

Showing posts with label stigmatisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stigmatisation. Show all posts

Friday, 1 July 2016

Shaping Our Lives: From Mental Illness to a Social Model of Madness and Distress

Logo of Shaping Our Lives: A National Network of Service Users and Disabled People

From Mental Illness to a Social Model of Madness and Distress (1)

There are growing concerns about UK mental health policy and services. They are widely seen as being in ‘crisis’,chronically underfunded and having fallen far behind physical healthcare. There are also more fundamental worries that they are over-reliant on a narrowly-based medicalised conceptual framework which can be stigmatizing and unhelpful for service users. 


Authors: Peter Beresford, Rebecca Perring, Mary Nettle, Jan Wallcraft

Foreword: Tina Coldham SCIE Trustee and Chair of the SCIE Co-Production Network www.scie.org.uk

Funding: Joseph Rowntree Foundation

Link address:

Thursday, 14 August 2014

Jobcentres unleash threat of G4S in place of privacy. What a way to say, "Hello"!

Witnessing jobcentre practices alongside KUWG, blogger Kate Belgrave quotes a jobcentre 'customer' saying "I didn't want my first #JSA meeting to be in a group session with a G4S guard" and notes:
I’d be keen to hear back from anyone who has experience of this:

I spent a couple of hours today talking with someone who is a new JSA claimant in North London. This man started his JSA claim a couple of weeks ago. It’s the first claim he’s made. He filled in an application form online and then was sent a text by the DWP some days later which called him to a meeting at a London jobcentre in the first week of August.
He assumed that the meeting would be one-to-one with a jobcentre advisor – a meeting where an advisor goes through the application in detail with the claimant and jobsearch requirements are set – but instead found that the meeting was a group session with about ten other new claimants and one G4S security guard who sat in the room the whole time. This man was shocked to find that this first meeting wasn’t private. He found the experience confusing and worrying, and wasn’t sure what he agreed to in it.

He said that he was certainly concerned about asking questions and sharing personal details and financial information in front of a group of strangers. He wasn’t the only one. He said that “a couple of the people there looked very nervous and anxious at the prospect of a group meeting,” and that people were worried about confidentiality.
Continue reading on Kate's blog....

See Swheatie's blog post relating to social conditioning Myelin and deep practice are good, but question CBT