Guest blog by CarerWatch
According to Mr Clegg, some carers experience 'an unbearable burden'.
As such, under the LibDem election promise, they will receive a
'reward' paid annually to allow them to have a break. This 'reward'?
£125 a year paid to those who receive carers allowance only. He suggests that ' Some carers might use the money to hire a care assistant to help them out for a week'
How out of touch are the Lib Dems?
Mr Clegg, have you ever tried to employ a care assistant for £125 a week?
Mr Clegg, have you ever tried working 24/7 and only having one week a year off? (Many carers get no breaks at all)
Mr Clegg, are you aware that many carers are not entitled to Carers Allowance
Carers do not want you to 'show our thanks and ease the pressure the nation's carers face' by giving some of us a paltry £125 a year.
Carers Allowance is paid at a rate below that of all
other income replacement benefits. Consequently any annual uprating has
a minimal impact and does not reflect the rise in the cost of living,
reducing carers spending power year on year and increasing the income
gap between carers and the rest of society.
Carers
in receipt of other income replacement benefits are excluded from
claiming Carers Allowance due to the overlapping benefit rule.
Carers
who have previously been entitled to Carers Allowance find that this is
removed on reaching retirement age causing distress and anger, this can
be after decades of caring for a sick or disabled relative.
The
current £102 earnings limit at which Carers Allowance is withdrawn is a
disincentive for carers who could combine work and caring to
contemplate work or, for those in part-time employment, to increase
their hours.
The
withdrawal of Carers Allowance when a carer embarks on an educational
course at college or university that entails more than 21 hours study
per week acts as a barrier to carers wishing to engage in education and
training in order to update their skills with a view to entering or
re-entering the workplace. Many financially-assisted educational courses
do not have Carers Allowance on their list of qualifying benefits for
reduced fees, making engaging in education unaffordable.
Correction added, thanks to Charles47 (
The blog has a mistake: the 21 hour rule is notional. If the course is
for (example) 10 hours only, but the college or university calls it a
full time course – you lose your Carers Allowance. So for many carers,
there’s no incentive to train.)
For
many carers, caring is a full-time occupation. In order to qualify for
Carers Allowance, either paid or underlying, a carer must spend a minimum of 35 hours caring per week, many carers care for substantially more
than the minimum 35 hours. Although not perceived as such, caring is a
full-time job and can involve meeting physical needs, psychological
needs and social needs, supervision, prompting, dealing with health and
care services, managing finances, medication, cleaning, shopping,
virtually every aspect of daily living.
Carers
have no regular hours of work, have no entitlement to breaks, days off,
holidays or sick leave, they are not covered by health and safety
legislation and frequently suffer injury as a consequence of caring. For
the majority of full-time carers employment is not an option, for those
they care for, being left with strangers is not an option.
The
real term reductions in Treasury funding for local authorities has
resulted in tightening eligibility criteria, the closure of day centres
and increased care costs, reducing the number of people able to access
or afford social care. Family carers are increasingly providing the care
that would have been previously been provided by the State.
All
governments, past and present, have demonstrably failed to meet the
financial needs of carers who do not have the option of taking up
employment.
CarerWatch members believe that family carers are not an optional extra to be added on as an after thought. ALL
political parties need to amend their attitude towards family carers
and make some speed in deciding how to adequately fund family carers.
To this end, we strongly advise Mr Clegg and his party to go back to the drawing board.Carers do not need half baked promises/policies that will bring about so little change for so few carers.Time will tell what manifesto promises Labour and Conservative parties bring forth. We remember well the hustings of 2010.Carer issues were aired more than ever, and yet there has been NO real improvements.Watch this space
.
|
Self-help support vs ravages of 'welfare reform'. Never attend anywhere official alone!
This blog currently focuses on national policy matters that impact upon KUWG members.
Kilburn Unemployed Workers Group as a group focuses primarily on combating benefits injustices locally through advocacy in individuals' benefit claims, and demonstrations that emphasise that there is hope when we come together. We are more angry than frightened.
Monday, 7 July 2014
CarerWatch response to LibDems manifesto promise for carers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment